summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/app
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Stone <thepeterstone@gmail.com>2026-10-27 07:54:25 +0000
committerPeter Stone <thepeterstone@gmail.com>2026-10-27 07:54:25 +0000
commit50b52d58e9865ac01e5364ec68247edb323db9b7 (patch)
tree868cb610482705138a32c07ffce95cae698b332b /app
parentaa046a7ee11a20914a5851dd0e5a89d129683b28 (diff)
Use the labels: seed signatures from them, and take them back
The labels have been arriving and sitting there. Now the shadow run acts on all three kinds. A report is advertising pointed at where detection found nothing, so it becomes a signature in its own right -- that being the whole gap the library exists to close, since the scan accounts for about 38% of what the feeds imply is there. A mark saying a break is right adds no audio, because the break is harvested anyway. What it adds is that a person vouched for it. A mark saying a break is wrong does two things. It stops that audio being harvested, and it takes back any signature already held that matches it. That second half is the one that matters: a signature built from programme would cut the programme in every episode carrying it, until somebody noticed. So his "no" removes it outright rather than lowering a score. Being pointed at outranks partners and occasions both. Those are ways of inferring what a stretch of audio is; he was there. A confirmed signature is trusted at once and stays confirmed -- he does not un-hear it next week. A report whose end was never corrected is trimmed to its first fifteen seconds. An uncorrected end is wherever the 25-second jump landed rather than where the advertising stopped, so its tail may be programme -- and one ad unit is already far more audio than a landmark fingerprint needs to be distinctive. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018AwnALZL6bD4VBtATDVv3B
Diffstat (limited to 'app')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions