|
Three reported bugs.
**"West Hawaii today articles get a bunch of stray Trending headers."**
The publisher's widget platform injects promo blocks between the real
paragraphs, inside the article's own container, so every structural
signal tells Readability they belong. What survives is a heading
labelling nothing, because the links under it are filled in by a script
that never runs in the reader. Confirmed on 9 of the 12 articles in
that feed, two each. Blocks marked `data-mrf-recirculation` are now
removed -- the attribute says what the block is for in the widget
platform's own words, which is a better signal than the word
"Trending", since an article may legitimately discuss what is trending.
Nothing longer than a label and a few headlines is ever removed. Also
applied to already-cached articles, in place rather than by discarding
them: the article was fine, only the litter has to go.
**"Can't subscribe to heathercoxrichardson.substack.com."** Adding a
feed handed whatever URL it was given straight to the XML parser, so a
site's home page -- the only URL a reader can actually see and copy --
failed on the root element. That page advertises its feed the way sites
have since 2002, in a <link rel="alternate"> in the head. It is now
read, resolved against the page, and fetched. Only what the page
declares: guessing /feed and /rss would add a burst of 404s to every
failed add and eventually subscribe somebody to the wrong thing.
**"YouTube play is misconfigured."** It was, and YouTube said so: the
player dialog loaded the embed as its own top-level document, which
answers with "Video player configuration error -- Error 153". An embed
has to be embedded. It now sits in an iframe on a minimal host page.
Measured in the app's own WebView: top-level, no requests for the video
stream and the error on screen; framed, the stream loads and there is
no error.
**"Long click on YouTube placeholder should open the URL directly."**
It does now. Worth recording why this is not simply the link's href:
for an image inside a link, WebView's hit test reports the image's URL,
so a long-press on the thumbnail arrives as the i.ytimg.com JPEG. The
video id is resolved out of that.
Verified on a device for all four: the Substack site URL adds "Letters
from an American" and fetches 20 articles; a West Hawaii Today article
extracts with no Trending headers and its body intact; the video plays;
and a long-press reaches the YouTube app.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018AwnALZL6bD4VBtATDVv3B
|
|
Reported live: reader mode on a New Republic feature showed nothing but
the cookie disclaimer, and had cached it.
Reproduced outside the app by running ReaderExtractor's own injected
script (Readability.js and all) against the real page. With the article
body present, extraction is perfect. With the body absent from the DOM at
the moment the script runs, Readability's first pass -- which discards
"unlikely candidates", and the Didomi banner's class is
didomi-notice-banner -- comes back under its own 500-character threshold,
so it retries with that stripping switched off. The banner's single
paragraph is 510 characters, i.e. just over the threshold, so it comes
back as the article with the right title attached.
Nothing on the Kotlin side looked at that. Any non-blank content counted
as ExtractionResult.Success, was written to articles.extractedContent,
and was never reconsidered -- so one bad load became a permanent cookie
disclaimer, which is the "extractedContent cached: true" in the report.
ConsentNotice recognises such a result: a hard plain-text length cap
first (nothing long is ever rejected, however much consent boilerplate it
quotes), then either a known CMP container id -- Readability strips
classes but keeps ids -- or two or more distinct consent phrases.
The accept/retry/give-up decision moves out of the WebView callback into
decideEvalOutcome so it can be tested without a device. A consent notice
is now "not ready yet", which routes it into the retry the extractor
already does for an empty result; if it survives all six attempts that is
what the page serves, and it fails as ExtractionFailure.ConsentInterstitial
rather than being accepted.
A fixed extractor cannot repair what is already on disk, so
loadCachedExtraction drops a cached notice on read and re-extracts, in
both ReaderScreen and LinkReaderScreen. No schema change: the repair
happens when the article is next opened. Reader mode is still never
turned on heuristically -- replacing a discarded notice does not flip it.
The bug report now also carries the last extraction error, without which
a report about bad reader content cannot say whether extraction failed.
Tests: 59 -> 78.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018AwnALZL6bD4VBtATDVv3B
|
