summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/superpowers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/superpowers')
-rw-r--r--docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-current-attempt-resolution.md362
1 files changed, 362 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-current-attempt-resolution.md b/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-current-attempt-resolution.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2111eca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-current-attempt-resolution.md
@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
+# Current Attempt Resolution Implementation Plan
+
+> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
+
+**Goal:** Build the `CurrentAttempt` resolution primitive `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-09-recursive-arbitrated-review-design.md` calls for, and wire `internal/executor.Pool.maybeUnblockParent` to resolve each of a roll-up's subtasks through it before checking completion. This is piece 2b of that design's implementation order.
+
+**Architecture:** Every position in a task tree is identified by an anchor task ID, set once. "The task currently representing that position" is *resolved*, not stored — `CurrentAttempt` walks forward through a chain of fix-attempt `DependsOn` edges (a fix-attempt is structurally: a task sharing the same `ParentTaskID` as the task it supersedes, whose sole `DependsOn` entry is that task's own ID). This is the exact shape `internal/scheduler.StoryOrchestrator.ensureFixAttempt` already creates for a story's root today (`ParentTaskID == ""`), and the exact shape any future subtask-level fix-attempt spawning will create too (`ParentTaskID` set to the rejected subtask's own parent). One function, one rule, works identically at any depth.
+
+`CurrentAttempt` lives in `internal/task` — the lowest-level package both `internal/executor` and `internal/scheduler` already import — behind a minimal `TaskLookup` interface (`GetTask`, `ListDependents`), which both `executor.Store` and `scheduler.StoryStore` already satisfy structurally. This avoids duplicating the walk logic once for each caller; `internal/executor.Pool.maybeUnblockParent` becomes the first real caller in this plan, and piece 3 (migrating the story-level fix loop off `RootTaskID` re-pointing) will become the second, later.
+
+**Tech Stack:** Go. No schema/storage changes.
+
+## Global Constraints
+
+- **This plan does not change *when* arbitrated review runs, or make `maybeUnblockParent` aware of pending/rejected verdicts.** Today, nothing spawns a subtask-level fix-attempt yet (that's piece 4, generalizing `ensureEvaluators`/`ensureArbitration` to recurse into subtask trees — deliberately not this plan). This plan only makes the *counting/completion-gate* logic correct for whenever such a fix-attempt chain *does* exist: it resolves each subtask through `CurrentAttempt` so a superseded original doesn't get counted as "the" position's final state, and so the gate doesn't wait on a stale task forever. Whether a roll-up should be allowed to unblock *before* arbitration has even had a chance to reject one of its children is a separate, open question that belongs to piece 4, which is what will actually introduce that race — this plan does not attempt to resolve it.
+- **Do not touch `ensureFixAttempt`, `story.RootTaskID`, or anything in `internal/scheduler`.** Migrating the story-level fix loop onto `CurrentAttempt` is piece 3, sequenced after this one so `CurrentAttempt` has one proven, isolated caller (`maybeUnblockParent`) before a second one is layered on.
+- **Do not touch `internal/api` or `handleRunResult`/`RecoverStaleBlocked`.** This plan only touches `maybeUnblockParent`'s subtask-counting loop, plus the new `internal/task/currentattempt.go`.
+
+---
+
+## Task 1: `CurrentAttempt` resolution + `maybeUnblockParent` generalization
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: `internal/task/currentattempt.go`
+- Test: `internal/task/currentattempt_test.go`
+- Modify: `internal/executor/executor.go` (`maybeUnblockParent`'s subtask-completion loop)
+- Test: `internal/executor/executor_test.go` (append)
+
+**Interfaces:**
+- Produces: `task.TaskLookup` interface, `task.CurrentAttempt(store TaskLookup, anchorID string) (*Task, error)`. Piece 3 (story-level fix-loop migration) will call this directly with `StoryOrchestrator.Store`, exactly as this plan calls it with `executor.Pool`'s own `store` field.
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing `CurrentAttempt` tests**
+
+Create `internal/task/currentattempt_test.go`:
+
+```go
+package task
+
+import (
+ "errors"
+ "testing"
+)
+
+type fakeLookup struct {
+ tasks map[string]*Task
+}
+
+func newFakeLookup() *fakeLookup {
+ return &fakeLookup{tasks: make(map[string]*Task)}
+}
+
+func (f *fakeLookup) GetTask(id string) (*Task, error) {
+ t, ok := f.tasks[id]
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, errors.New("not found")
+ }
+ return t, nil
+}
+
+func (f *fakeLookup) ListDependents(taskID string) ([]*Task, error) {
+ var out []*Task
+ for _, t := range f.tasks {
+ for _, d := range t.DependsOn {
+ if d == taskID {
+ out = append(out, t)
+ break
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return out, nil
+}
+
+func TestCurrentAttempt_NoFixAttempt_ReturnsAnchorItself(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ lookup.tasks["a"] = &Task{ID: "a"}
+
+ got, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a" {
+ t.Errorf("got %q, want a", got.ID)
+ }
+}
+
+func TestCurrentAttempt_OneFixAttempt_ResolvesToIt(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ lookup.tasks["a"] = &Task{ID: "a", ParentTaskID: "parent-1"}
+ lookup.tasks["a-fix1"] = &Task{ID: "a-fix1", ParentTaskID: "parent-1", DependsOn: []string{"a"}}
+
+ got, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a-fix1" {
+ t.Errorf("got %q, want a-fix1", got.ID)
+ }
+}
+
+func TestCurrentAttempt_ChainOfFixAttempts_ResolvesToTip(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ lookup.tasks["a"] = &Task{ID: "a", ParentTaskID: "parent-1"}
+ lookup.tasks["a-fix1"] = &Task{ID: "a-fix1", ParentTaskID: "parent-1", DependsOn: []string{"a"}}
+ lookup.tasks["a-fix2"] = &Task{ID: "a-fix2", ParentTaskID: "parent-1", DependsOn: []string{"a-fix1"}}
+
+ got, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a-fix2" {
+ t.Errorf("got %q, want a-fix2 (tip of the chain)", got.ID)
+ }
+
+ // Resolving from an intermediate link in the chain also lands on the tip.
+ got, err = CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a-fix1")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a-fix2" {
+ t.Errorf("resolving from a-fix1: got %q, want a-fix2", got.ID)
+ }
+}
+
+// TestCurrentAttempt_DependentWithDifferentParent_NotTreatedAsFixAttempt
+// proves a task that depends on "a" but has a DIFFERENT ParentTaskID (e.g.
+// an unrelated Evaluator task depending on a Builder for scheduling reasons)
+// must not be mistaken for a's fix attempt.
+func TestCurrentAttempt_DependentWithDifferentParent_NotTreatedAsFixAttempt(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ lookup.tasks["a"] = &Task{ID: "a", ParentTaskID: "parent-1"}
+ lookup.tasks["unrelated"] = &Task{ID: "unrelated", ParentTaskID: "", DependsOn: []string{"a"}}
+
+ got, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a" {
+ t.Errorf("got %q, want a (unrelated dependent must not be treated as a fix attempt)", got.ID)
+ }
+}
+
+// TestCurrentAttempt_DependentWithMultipleDependsOn_NotTreatedAsFixAttempt
+// proves a fix attempt has exactly one DependsOn entry (the task it
+// supersedes); a task depending on "a" among several dependencies (e.g. an
+// Arbitration task depending on all 4 Evaluators) must not be mistaken for
+// a's fix attempt.
+func TestCurrentAttempt_DependentWithMultipleDependsOn_NotTreatedAsFixAttempt(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ lookup.tasks["a"] = &Task{ID: "a", ParentTaskID: "parent-1"}
+ lookup.tasks["multi-dep"] = &Task{ID: "multi-dep", ParentTaskID: "parent-1", DependsOn: []string{"a", "b"}}
+
+ got, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "a")
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("CurrentAttempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.ID != "a" {
+ t.Errorf("got %q, want a", got.ID)
+ }
+}
+
+func TestCurrentAttempt_UnknownAnchor_ReturnsError(t *testing.T) {
+ lookup := newFakeLookup()
+ if _, err := CurrentAttempt(lookup, "does-not-exist"); err == nil {
+ t.Error("expected an error for an unknown anchor ID")
+ }
+}
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests to verify they fail**
+
+Run: `go test ./internal/task/ -run TestCurrentAttempt -v`
+Expected: compile failure — `CurrentAttempt`/`TaskLookup` don't exist yet. Paste the actual output.
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Implement `CurrentAttempt`**
+
+Create `internal/task/currentattempt.go`:
+
+```go
+package task
+
+// TaskLookup is the minimal interface CurrentAttempt needs: resolving a
+// task by ID and finding tasks that depend on it. Both
+// internal/executor.Store and internal/scheduler.StoryStore already satisfy
+// this structurally, so CurrentAttempt lives here (in the lowest-level
+// package both already import) rather than being duplicated in each.
+type TaskLookup interface {
+ GetTask(id string) (*Task, error)
+ ListDependents(taskID string) ([]*Task, error)
+}
+
+// maxAttemptChainWalk bounds CurrentAttempt's forward walk as a defense
+// against a pathological/cyclic DependsOn chain (task creation doesn't
+// reject cycles) -- in practice, no caller creates chains anywhere near
+// this long; a much smaller, intentional policy limit (e.g.
+// internal/scheduler's own maxFixAttempts) is what actually bounds real
+// fix-attempt chains in normal operation.
+const maxAttemptChainWalk = 100
+
+// CurrentAttempt resolves the task that currently represents the logical
+// position anchored at anchorID: anchorID itself, or -- if it was rejected
+// and a fix attempt exists -- the fix attempt, walking forward through
+// however many rejections have occurred. A fix-attempt task is identified
+// structurally: a task with the same ParentTaskID as the task it supersedes,
+// whose sole DependsOn entry is that task's own ID -- the exact shape a
+// fix-attempt is spawned with, whether at a story's root (ParentTaskID ==
+// "") or at an arbitrary subtask position (ParentTaskID set). This is the
+// one place "which task is current" is ever decided; callers resolve
+// through this before checking a position's own completion/verdict state,
+// never operating on a raw anchor ID directly once a fix-attempt might
+// exist. See docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-09-recursive-arbitrated-review-design.md.
+func CurrentAttempt(store TaskLookup, anchorID string) (*Task, error) {
+ current, err := store.GetTask(anchorID)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+ for i := 0; i < maxAttemptChainWalk; i++ {
+ dependents, err := store.ListDependents(current.ID)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+ var next *Task
+ for _, d := range dependents {
+ if d.ParentTaskID == current.ParentTaskID && len(d.DependsOn) == 1 && d.DependsOn[0] == current.ID {
+ next = d
+ break
+ }
+ }
+ if next == nil {
+ return current, nil
+ }
+ current = next
+ }
+ return current, nil
+}
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Run tests to verify they pass**
+
+Run: `go test ./internal/task/ -run TestCurrentAttempt -v`
+Expected: PASS, all 6 tests. Paste the actual output.
+
+- [ ] **Step 5: Write the failing `maybeUnblockParent` generalization test**
+
+Append to `internal/executor/executor_test.go`, directly after `TestPool_RecoverStaleBlocked_PromotesNestedSubtaskParent` (the last test added by the previous plan):
+
+```go
+// TestPool_MaybeUnblockParent_ResolvesSubtaskThroughCurrentAttempt proves
+// the parent's "are all subtasks done" gate resolves each subtask through
+// task.CurrentAttempt first -- so a subtask that was superseded by a
+// fix-attempt sibling (same ParentTaskID, DependsOn=[original]) correctly
+// waits for the FIX ATTEMPT to complete, not just the stale original that
+// already reached COMPLETED before being superseded.
+func TestPool_MaybeUnblockParent_ResolvesSubtaskThroughCurrentAttempt(t *testing.T) {
+ store := testStore(t)
+ logger := slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError}))
+ pool := NewPool(2, map[string]Runner{"claude": &mockRunner{}}, store, logger)
+
+ parent := makeTask("resolve-parent")
+ parent.State = task.StateBlocked
+ store.CreateTask(parent)
+
+ original := makeTask("resolve-original")
+ original.ParentTaskID = parent.ID
+ original.State = task.StateCompleted // rejected, but its own execution finished
+ store.CreateTask(original)
+
+ fixAttempt := makeTask("resolve-fix-attempt")
+ fixAttempt.ParentTaskID = parent.ID
+ fixAttempt.DependsOn = []string{original.ID}
+ fixAttempt.State = task.StateRunning // still in progress
+ store.CreateTask(fixAttempt)
+
+ pool.maybeUnblockParent(parent.ID)
+
+ got, err := store.GetTask(parent.ID)
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("get parent: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.State != task.StateBlocked {
+ t.Errorf("parent state: want still BLOCKED (fix attempt not done yet), got %v", got.State)
+ }
+
+ // Now the fix attempt finishes.
+ if err := store.UpdateTaskState(fixAttempt.ID, task.StateCompleted); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("complete fix attempt: %v", err)
+ }
+ pool.maybeUnblockParent(parent.ID)
+
+ got, err = store.GetTask(parent.ID)
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("get parent: %v", err)
+ }
+ if got.State != task.StateReady {
+ t.Errorf("parent state: want READY (fix attempt now done), got %v", got.State)
+ }
+}
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 6: Run the test to verify it fails**
+
+Run: `go test ./internal/executor/ -run TestPool_MaybeUnblockParent_ResolvesSubtaskThroughCurrentAttempt -v`
+Expected: FAILS at the first assertion — today's `maybeUnblockParent` checks `original.State` directly (already `COMPLETED`) and ignores that it's been superseded by the still-running `fixAttempt`, so it incorrectly promotes `parent` to `READY` immediately instead of waiting. Paste the actual output.
+
+- [ ] **Step 7: Generalize `maybeUnblockParent`'s subtask-completion loop**
+
+In `internal/executor/executor.go`, find the loop inside `maybeUnblockParent`:
+
+```go
+ for _, sub := range subtasks {
+ if sub.State != task.StateCompleted {
+ return
+ }
+ }
+```
+
+Replace it with:
+
+```go
+ for _, sub := range subtasks {
+ current, err := task.CurrentAttempt(p.store, sub.ID)
+ if err != nil {
+ p.logger.Error("maybeUnblockParent: resolve current attempt", "parentID", parentID, "subtaskID", sub.ID, "error", err)
+ return
+ }
+ if current.State != task.StateCompleted {
+ return
+ }
+ }
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 8: Run tests to verify they pass**
+
+Run: `go test ./internal/executor/ -run 'TestPool_(MaybeUnblockParent|Submit_|RecoverStaleBlocked)' -v`
+Expected: PASS, all of them — the new test, plus every pre-existing `TestPool_Submit_*`/`TestPool_RecoverStaleBlocked_*` test from this and the previous plan, unmodified. A subtask with no fix-attempt resolves to itself via `CurrentAttempt` (Step 3's `TestCurrentAttempt_NoFixAttempt_ReturnsAnchorItself` already proves this in isolation), so every existing test's behavior is unchanged. Paste the actual output.
+
+- [ ] **Step 9: Run the full package suite, then the full repo suite**
+
+Run: `go test ./internal/task/... ./internal/executor/...`
+Expected: PASS for everything.
+
+Then run: `go test ./...` (the entire repo). This must also pass — paste the actual output. If `internal/api` flakes under the race detector on a one-off "sql: database is closed" teardown error unrelated to this task's actual changes, rerun once before treating it as real. If it fails a second time in a way connected to your actual changes, stop and call ask_user.
+
+Also run `gofmt -l internal/task/currentattempt.go internal/task/currentattempt_test.go internal/executor/executor.go internal/executor/executor_test.go` before committing — this repo has had gofmt regressions slip through in prior tasks this session by copying plan markdown's own formatting verbatim; run `gofmt -w` on any file it flags that wasn't already gofmt-dirty before your changes (check with `git show HEAD:<path> | gofmt -l -` if unsure whether dirtiness is pre-existing).
+
+- [ ] **Step 10: Commit and push to `main` directly, matching this repo's existing workflow**
+
+```bash
+git add internal/task/currentattempt.go internal/task/currentattempt_test.go internal/executor/executor.go internal/executor/executor_test.go
+git commit -m "feat(task,executor): add CurrentAttempt resolution, wire maybeUnblockParent to resolve through it"
+```
+
+## Mandatory verification disclosure
+
+When you call report_summary, paste the actual terminal output of every test command above — literal pass/fail counts, not a claim of success, including the full-repo `go test ./...` run. If anything here is ambiguous or conflicts with what you find in the actual repo, call ask_user and describe the specific conflict — don't guess or silently decide.
+
+---
+
+## Final Verification
+
+- [ ] Run `go build ./...` — passes.
+- [ ] Run `go test ./...` — passes, full repo.
+- [ ] Run `grep -rn "CurrentAttempt" internal/` to visually confirm the File Map was actually touched (should be `internal/task/currentattempt.go`, `internal/task/currentattempt_test.go`, and `internal/executor/executor.go` only — nothing in `internal/scheduler` yet, since that's piece 3).