| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
reporting
Plan 1 of the recursive-story-decomposition design (see
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-08-recursive-story-decomposition-design.md).
Deliberately scoped to two small, independent, fully-groundable additions
-- SubtaskSpec.DependsOn and a structured report_verdict tool closing the
"arbitration never parses its own verdict" gap -- rather than attempting
the full recursive orchestrator rewrite in one pass. That rewrite becomes
its own plan(s) once story_orchestrator_test.go (1023 lines of existing
convention) has been read in full.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VTUSAEKfsPc6WGDq45yPHD
|
|
This should have been committed alongside the design spec (f626155) before
task execution began. It wasn't -- every claudomator container that cloned
this repo during the Tasks board build never actually had this file, since
containers clone from the pushed remote, not the local working tree. Tasks
dispatched with only a "read this file" instruction had nothing to read and
silently improvised instead, which explains most of the review-cycle churn
during that build far better than "the implementer didn't follow
instructions" did. Committing now for the historical record and so the
gap can't repeat for this specific file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VTUSAEKfsPc6WGDq45yPHD
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
