From a6d58e009efcc06e7b5221d75ebed36533786dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Claude Code Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 18:06:00 +0000 Subject: Merge titanium's diverged memory tree into the shared history Titanium and tungsten had grown two separate, unreconciled memory sets for the same -workspace scope. Ports over 18 titanium-only entries (12 claudomator files, the fork-scope-creep lesson, the doot Google Tasks OAuth limitation, the default-subagent-driven-execution preference, scout's Facebook priority, Hawaii GIS endpoints), merges two true duplicates into their existing tungsten files rather than keeping parallel copies (the migration-rename incident -- same 022->023 rename, same commit, titanium's version added the confirmed-safe-to-patch-prod-directly carve-out tungsten's didn't have; the APK build OOM note, folded into project_doot_widget_build.md as a RAM-constrained-host fallback), and marks doot_future_task_scheduling_ideas.md as historical now that all four of its backlog items (budgets, labels/projects, buckets, chains) are built. --- feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md (limited to 'feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md') diff --git a/feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md b/feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a13c646 --- /dev/null +++ b/feedback_default_subagent_driven_execution.md @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +--- +name: feedback-default-subagent-driven-execution +description: "User wants Subagent-Driven Development as the default execution choice for implementation plans, without being asked each time" +metadata: + node_type: memory + type: feedback + originSessionId: 61c70ef2-1b1b-456c-9cbd-ad1f76ea2401 +--- + +When presenting the writing-plans skill's execution-choice prompt ("1. Subagent-Driven" vs "2. Inline Execution"), default to Subagent-Driven Development without waiting for the user to pick. + +**Why:** User replied "1, always" when asked — explicitly signaling this choice should stick across future plans in this project (doot), not just this one instance. + +**How to apply:** Still present the two options briefly for transparency/interruptibility, but proceed straight into `superpowers:subagent-driven-development` (dispatch Task 1's implementer) rather than pausing to wait for an answer, unless the user says otherwise for a specific plan. -- cgit v1.2.3